| The Masculine
Pattern of Grief
This concept is supported by the research on gender and
grief. First, current research clearly does not support the
concept that women grieve more effectively than men. Here
conclusions of studies vary considerably.
Second, the limited research on gender shows that men and women
deal with grief somewhat differently, in ways highly reflective of
the traditional gender roles they have been taught. For
example, noted grief researcher, C. M. Parkes, found widowers tended
to speak more about the loss of their wives as a
"dismemberment," while women tended to experience the loss
of their husbands more in terms of "abandonment."
This finding is not surprising since every culture has norms that
govern both behavior and emotions. These norms or
"rules" teach us what feelings should be evoked and what
feelings ought to be suppressed.
Men are taught early to be self-sufficient. They, for
example, are reluctant to participate in self-help groups. Dr.
Therese Rando, a clinician and writer, suggests men, after the death
of their child, ten to see themselves as needing to be providers,
protectors, and problem solvers, making it difficult to accept and
to receive help. Other studies have found men to be more
private, intellectual, and introspective in their grief. Dr.
Parkes reported that the widowers in his study were concerned with
being "realistic," i.e. focusing on solving the immediate
problems of loss. He found men more likely to experience
social recovery earlier, often quickly returning to work.
Returning to work was seen as a coping mechanism, allowing the men
to become distracted from their grief.
This suggests there may be another pattern of coping with loss -
one that is less emotional, but more active and cognitive.
Most masculine grievers, for example, seem to find it difficult to
express emotions outside of anger. Dennis, whose child was
stillborn, expresses this reluctance.
"I knew I could hide my feelings very well. I had
learned that, and counted it as a strength. People who thought
similarly would never try to draw out someone's feelings unless they
wanted to humiliate him or her. I was thankful to these, for
there were times when I was very close to that fearful state of
being out of control of my emotions. But I was spared that
indignity. I had cast myself in the role of the strong one and
was trying to live up to that role."
Whether they express anger or not, masculine grievers seem more comfortable
in dealing with grief cognitively and actively. Hence, they
may immerse themselves in activity. They choose legal or
physical actions in response to the loss. For example, Jim,
whose son was lost and assumed dead after the crash of his training
plane, found solace by being actively involved in the search.
Other masculine grievers take active roles in the funeral
planning. All of those are typical of masculine grief. Masculine
grievers may focus on the problems caused by loss, actively trying
to find appropriate solutions. If these mechanisms are not
helpful or successful, masculine grievers may tend to escape and
soothe themselves with alcohol or other drugs.
There may even be types of masculine grievers. Some, for
example, may, in fact, be suppressing evident emotion. There
are those who are the problematic grievers who have strong emotions
but because of their own perceptions of their role or the
expectation of others have to submerge their feelings and be
strong. Another type may find it helpful to control emotion,
choosing the time that they find it safe and appropriate to emote,
perhaps crying in the car. This type can control their
emotional expression and find it therapeutic to do so. Yet,
still another type of masculine griever does not suppress emotion as
their style of coping is not strongly emotional, but primarily
active and cognitive. This group may even be concerned that they
seemingly lack strong emotional, but primarily active and
problem-focused solutions for coping with stress. They are
taught to value self reliance. Solving one's problems and
facing one's difficulties alone have long been defined as marks of
manhood.
Female experience tends to be different. From early age on,
girls' play tends to be more cooperative than competitive. At
early ages, girls are taught to share confidences and draw support
from on another. Emotional expressiveness is encouraged and
girls and young women are taught more emotion focused ways of
coping. They are encouraged to seek support or nurturance from
others. In fact, the ability to offer and to accept such nurturance
is defined as crucial in women's roles. Women who are
masculine grievers may have been socialized in ways that discouraged
emotional expression, or perhaps they were thrust into significant care giving
roles at a very early age. Here taking responsibility for and
care of others became a major role.
How to Help
As caregivers, we need to first build upon, rather than resist,
these masculine patterns of grief. Participating in therapy or
attending support groups should be defined as problem solving or
protective actions - a way to assist others in the family, for
example.
Counseling or support must be defined as ways for men (and women
with this style) to master the process of grieving. It can be
affirmed that they seem to be coping with the loss better than
others. Many self-help books on grief can also be helpful if
they are cognitively oriented. Among other advantages, books
can be read in solitude.
Second, we must allow masculine grievers to express emotion in
ways comparable with their own style. For example, masculine
grievers may find it more comfortable to discuss
"reactions" rather than "feelings." In
other cases, coping responses such as humor or activity may
represent forms of emotional release. These modes of
expression should be respected.
Third, caregivers should encourage masculine grievers to take an
active and problem-solving focus. Some may wish to take an
active role in planning and personalizing the funeral. Even
after the funeral, therapeutic rituals may offer powerful
opportunities to express loss and enfranchise grief. Following
court cases or participating in legislative efforts may be viewed as
a form of therapy.
The most helpful role others can have is to help grievers
examine, evaluate, and support their attempts to cope. Masculine
grievers need affirmation that their way of coping is a legitimate
way to deal with the loss. Doing so validates the desire
to cope in one's own way. Some men need to hear that it is
okay to grieve in the more traditional, emotional ways. For
example, one man needed reassurance that his expression of emotion
and strong need for his wife's support as he reacted to the death of
his father was both appropriate and manly. In another case, a
man who became intensely involved in work and his child's memorial
fund needed to hear that this too was an appropriate way of
coping. Women who are masculine grievers also may need similar
reassurance.
When we as caregivers fail to support and affirm these coping styles,
we disenfranchise masculine grievers. We are saying that
unless you grieve in on specific way, you are not really grieving.
As with other significant variables, such as culture, we need to
affirm that each style of coping has both strengths and
limitations. There are strengths in expressing emotion and
seeking support as there is strength in stoically continuing in the
face of loss and finding amelioration in cognitive and active
ways. We can learn from both approaches. Different modes
of coping are just that - differences not deficiencies.
Reprinted with permission of The Compassionate
Friends from the 2001 National Conference Professional Seminar
Handbook.
Originally printed in the Summer 1997 Caregivers
Quarterly: Volume 12, Number 2
|